This is a very interesting discussion of Gnostic gospels and I was interested to learn that it may well be that the Gospel of Thomas may not deserve to be lumped in with the gnostic writings, it could be earlier and it does not betray normal Gnostic emphases, though in fact it seem that it may not add anything much to the canonical gospels.
Useful still when following up the Da Vinci Code and certain 'NewAge' claims.
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Christian England? Maybe not...
I've just read an interesting blog article from Paul Kingsnorth . I've responded to it elsewhere with regard to its consideration of...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
I've just had an article published on emergingchurch.info. It's an adaptation of some of my book, but I thought I'd share it and...
No comments:
Post a Comment