Guardian Unlimited Money | Credit and debt |
In my time I've had a bit to do with helping people where debt has spiralled out of control and I must say that it seems to me that this kind of thing is usurious; I do hope that the fall out from this ruling provokes some changes to the rules. I don't in principle think that charging fees for loans is a bad thing [even if they are based on percentages over time -ie interest -because at low rates interest seems like quite a good way to charge a fee]. What does need looking at is charging interest on arrears and penalty fees which is the big factor that leads to debts spiralling uncontrollably. Perhaps there should be a ceiling so that the total paid pbakc cannot be over a certain amount ... it's tough but what happened to this couple is clearly iniquitous and there should be a grown-up way to address the iniquity.
From the judge:
"'Where the rate concerned is as high as 34.9% it seems to me that the combination of factors is so potentially exorbitant that it is grossly so and does grossly contravene the ordinary principles of fair dealing.' He added: 'This is one of the few credit bargains which is extortionate.'"
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A review of Faithful Exchange
My interest in Christian considerations of economics goes back decades. I studied economics at A level before I started university and have...
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
-
Unexpected (and sorry, it's from Friday -but I was a bit busy the end of last week), but I'm really pleased for the city which I sti...
-
The other day on Mastodon, I came across an article about left-wing politics and Jesus. It appears to have been written from a Christian-na...
No comments:
Post a Comment