20 February 2005

Markets, etc.

You may or may not have noticed that a couple of weeks back I dropped 'The Commons Blog' from my blog roll. While I agreed with their basic stance that if externalities were included then the market would produce solutions to the environmental issues we have, I started to find that the global warming denialism and rose-tinted view of current environmental realities got too much to stomach: esentially I had an allergic reaction to right-wing market libertarianism, I guess. Interesting then to find this article critiquing the 'commoners' approach in terms of the romantic image they purvey of the owner forgetting the corporation: "despite their [ie the corporations'] legal status as individuals, they have no self. Of course corporations plan for the future, but in contrast to individuals, they are biased heavily toward short-term profit. The individuals that compose them at any given moment are under huge pressure to raise profits -- for good reason, as corporations who are not growing are eaten by others that are. A corporation does not know if it will exist in 10 years, or 5. For a corporation, the future itself is part of the commons, and yes, the result is often tragedy."

Markets, etc. | Gristmill: The environmental news blog | Grist Magazine:

No comments:

Review: It happened in Hell

 It seemed to me that this book set out to do two main things. One was to demonstrate that so many of our notions of what goes under the lab...