I'm no royalist-loyalist and so I find the irony implicit in this rather delicious: "Dr Cretney and other experts raised the question of whether the marriage was actually legal under existing law. Dr Cretney argues that members of the royal family have no power under marriage law to contract civil marriages."
Ouch! the downsides of monarchy ...
Though in fairness it does look like it is, as they say, a moot point -read the article to find out why.
Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Royal wedding open to all, says law
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A review of Faithful Exchange
My interest in Christian considerations of economics goes back decades. I studied economics at A level before I started university and have...
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
-
Unexpected (and sorry, it's from Friday -but I was a bit busy the end of last week), but I'm really pleased for the city which I sti...
-
The other day on Mastodon, I came across an article about left-wing politics and Jesus. It appears to have been written from a Christian-na...
No comments:
Post a Comment