I wonder whether these are the same companies that pay for research to show that global warming either isn't proven or isn't anthropogenic? "Twenty-five U.S. energy companies have committed $3 million to establish six biological carbon sequestration projects in Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi through a group called PowerTree Carbon Co. The consortium aims to plant enough trees to capture more than 2 million tons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere"
Anyway, such research seems to indicate that they do think that there's a problem ... I can't help feeling though that the more sensible way to run a power business is not to define yourself as a caol-fired power station company and so to find ways to carry on burning fossil fuel, surely it is better to define yourself a being in the power business and finding alternatives or even being in the busniness of keeping people warm or cool and well-lit and perhaps seeling services that save external power and maintain in-house generation or savings.
Scientists Looking at Ways to Trap Greenhouse Gases (washingtonpost.com):
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment