Me: I've laways been a little suspicious of battery gadgets that do what we can do for ourselves relatively easily. It's also a matter of adding more batteies to landfill. So I was interested to knote this: "an exhaustive review of 42 dental trials, involving 3,800 participants, shows the old-style brush is just as effective." Only one type of electric brush showed up better. However, the rider is also that you need to brush for c 2mins not the average 40 seconds and you need to brush into the gum line [therefore a softer brush may be in order or you'll lose some gum like I did at one point].
The Observer | UK News | Electric gadgets get the brushoff:
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review: It happened in Hell
It seemed to me that this book set out to do two main things. One was to demonstrate that so many of our notions of what goes under the lab...
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
-
Unexpected (and sorry, it's from Friday -but I was a bit busy the end of last week), but I'm really pleased for the city which I sti...
-
The other day on Mastodon, I came across an article about left-wing politics and Jesus. It appears to have been written from a Christian-na...
No comments:
Post a Comment