As 'luck' would have it I ran into this straight after writing the last entry: "The study found that female graduates, who on average earn �158,000 more than non-graduates during their working lifetime, benefit more than university-educated men, who on average earn �142,000 more than non-graduates. Male arts graduates came out bottom in the study, earning less in their careers than those who started work without a degree."
Now I realise that some of this represents women playing catch up with men, but I also wonder whether it may not be an illustration that men are in a failing position in terms of worldly 'success'
EducationGuardian.co.uk | higher news | Worth of degree fallen to �150,000, research shows:
03 June 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg -
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment