"Transport Secretary, Alistair Darling, will use his first address since the election to launch a 'national debate' on the importance of introducing a national road-pricing scheme to solve Britain's chronic congestion." Well it's not quite as the heaedlines nd first para make it seem; just a debate, but I think the aim is to produce a climate in which 'polluter pays' would become a policy tenet, in effect. Hugely significant if it can go thorugh, not only because it would mean that actual journeys would be taxed/fee-payable [thus eliminating road tax as a flat-rate fee for ownership of a vehicle] but also because it creates or helps to create a sense that the way things are used should make a difference to their price if they have repurcussions for others. A kind of hypothecation of fee-payment may become possible. My main concern about this proposal is that if it has no room for dealing with the fossil carbon issue. From that point of view a carbon tax might be a better idea.
The Observer | UK News | Drivers to pay �1.30 per mile: [:roads:]
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Science And Spirituality Of Addiction
What drew me in was the collocation of science and spirituality in the title. I'm also a little interested in addiction through having ...
-
Interesting insight into the Muslim world: my favourite progresive muslim site has been hacked and attacked by islamists accusing those who ...
-
Some readers will recall that I'm keen in principle on a thorough review of the way we do dioceses in the CofE. I'm not starry-eyed...
-
This book is one that I now seriously consider recommending to the student Christian groups I'm in touch with whose basis is Evangelic...
No comments:
Post a Comment