"Transport Secretary, Alistair Darling, will use his first address since the election to launch a 'national debate' on the importance of introducing a national road-pricing scheme to solve Britain's chronic congestion." Well it's not quite as the heaedlines nd first para make it seem; just a debate, but I think the aim is to produce a climate in which 'polluter pays' would become a policy tenet, in effect. Hugely significant if it can go thorugh, not only because it would mean that actual journeys would be taxed/fee-payable [thus eliminating road tax as a flat-rate fee for ownership of a vehicle] but also because it creates or helps to create a sense that the way things are used should make a difference to their price if they have repurcussions for others. A kind of hypothecation of fee-payment may become possible. My main concern about this proposal is that if it has no room for dealing with the fossil carbon issue. From that point of view a carbon tax might be a better idea.
The Observer | UK News | Drivers to pay �1.30 per mile: [:roads:]
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
No comments:
Post a Comment