"Transport Secretary, Alistair Darling, will use his first address since the election to launch a 'national debate' on the importance of introducing a national road-pricing scheme to solve Britain's chronic congestion." Well it's not quite as the heaedlines nd first para make it seem; just a debate, but I think the aim is to produce a climate in which 'polluter pays' would become a policy tenet, in effect. Hugely significant if it can go thorugh, not only because it would mean that actual journeys would be taxed/fee-payable [thus eliminating road tax as a flat-rate fee for ownership of a vehicle] but also because it creates or helps to create a sense that the way things are used should make a difference to their price if they have repurcussions for others. A kind of hypothecation of fee-payment may become possible. My main concern about this proposal is that if it has no room for dealing with the fossil carbon issue. From that point of view a carbon tax might be a better idea.
The Observer | UK News | Drivers to pay �1.30 per mile: [:roads:]
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review: It happened in Hell
It seemed to me that this book set out to do two main things. One was to demonstrate that so many of our notions of what goes under the lab...
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
-
Unexpected (and sorry, it's from Friday -but I was a bit busy the end of last week), but I'm really pleased for the city which I sti...
-
The other day on Mastodon, I came across an article about left-wing politics and Jesus. It appears to have been written from a Christian-na...
No comments:
Post a Comment