20 September 2005

national pensions debate?

Under current rules I am approximately half way through my working lifetime. As some readers will be aware I'm at present undertaking a not entirely voluntary career break which will soon begin to have implications for my retirement. I'm also looking at a situation where I may have 10-20 good years of retirement in relative good health. That's if the potential heart problem is kept at bay by my efforts to keep adaquately exercised and properly 'dieted'. Actually, as I view that prospect along with knowing myself through this period of not working for money very often, I think that I welcome 'removing the barriers to flexible retirement and the way pensions are paid'
And I think that I this makes for interesting reflection.
"studies showing that, while men retiring at 65 and women at 60 currently receive a basic state pension of £82, deferring to 70 could allow payments to rise to £130.."
That is assuming that climate change hasn't caused so much disruption that 'all bets are off'. And it feels like it is a bet. I'm starting to wonder whether I'd be better off learning things like plumbing, house repair and building, basic agriculture and so on ....
Guardian Unlimited Money | News_ | Brown calls for national pensions debate:

No comments:

Review: It happened in Hell

 It seemed to me that this book set out to do two main things. One was to demonstrate that so many of our notions of what goes under the lab...