Whatever your perspective on intelligent design, it does seem to me that there have been some irresponsible charges and a huge rhetorical effort directed against it which seems to almost willfully set up aunt Sallies. If you want to see what ID'ers actually think and propose and how it fits with the whole Darwinist debate, then look at this response to an article in the Torygraph /Telegraph which reproduces the original but adds comments in-text from an ID perspective. Thus you get the idea rather well. A good reference article. I think that many evolutionists have simply assumed, on the basis of the rhetoric, that ID is creationism rewrit. I think that this riposted article shows otherwise.
ID.Plus: Richard Fortey rants at straw man of ID
Filed in: ID, Darwinism, evolution, theory, debate
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
No comments:
Post a Comment