This is a bit worrying; how the government assesses whether someone is genuine in a claim of conversion. For example one Afghani; "In court he was required to name Jesus’s 12 disciples to prove his conversion was genuine. He answered this and other questions correctly, but was unable to name 'Advent' as the run up to Christmas."
While I'd be okay on Advent, I'm not sure I could name all twelve apostles off the top of my head: after all a big chunk of them don't really crop up again and so end up not in active recall. There are sensible ideas for tests in the rest of the article, but really: is this an illustration of government education policies: only what's susceptible to a standardised test of pub-quiz is worthy or of value ... ? It's a shame people's lives literally are at stake in some of this.
How the Government tests for faith -Times Online:
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Bible in a Disenchanted Age -a brief review
Why this book? For me? -I've been finding myself wanting to wrestle more and more with the interface between scholarly questions and de...
-
Interesting insight into the Muslim world: my favourite progresive muslim site has been hacked and attacked by islamists accusing those who ...
-
Some readers will recall that I'm keen in principle on a thorough review of the way we do dioceses in the CofE. I'm not starry-eyed...
-
This book is one that I now seriously consider recommending to the student Christian groups I'm in touch with whose basis is Evangelic...
1 comment:
There's an episode of The West Wing called "Shibboleth" that addresses this issue rather well.
Post a Comment