The blog I found this on has the comment
"don't know enough about Mormon theology to know if this bit of propaganda is accurate or not "
Well I'd like to know too. From my time with Mormon missionaries and their literature it seems to be accurate at those points that I recall learning about, But does anyone one know if it has any inaccuracies? For example, I have a question about the dark skin etiology: I thought that they'd rescinded that.
AlterNet: Blogs: Video: The Cartoon Mitt Romney Doesn’t Want You To See [VIDEO]:
12 December 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg -
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
No comments:
Post a Comment