It looks like my earlier observations that we need to find ways to give an incentive to energy suppliers to help consumers consume less energy while still able to make a profit is being taken seriously by the UK government. Visit this web page to see the start of a consultation phase to work out how to do it.Defra, UK - Environmental Protection - Sustainable Energy - Supplier obligation: It claims that the "Government’s vision is to see a supplier obligation through which consumers will continue to enjoy at least their current level of warmth, light and comfort, whilst also achieving substantial carbon and energy savings."
As I say, I can only think that moving to a service model (which British Gas seem to be doing with boilers) which conceives of the utility company more as a seller and maintainer of means to keep one warm, lit and able to use devices than of the energy per se. But maybe there are other better ideas. I just haven't found much exploration of this issue yet. Of course, if you know better ... comment.
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
No comments:
Post a Comment