16 September 2008
Homophile and homoagapaic?
Ever since a college forum on human sexuality in the summer term, I've been musing over the fact that I find the arguments against homosexual relationships (I'm talking about non-promiscuous, here) based in Romans 1 less and less convincing. And today I read something that seemed to make sense of the implausibility, for me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg -
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
No comments:
Post a Comment