Actually this seems to be a set of results that will require further research. Spirituality Protects Against Depression Better Than Church Attendance But it is worth noting this: "Researchers also found that those who attended religious services were 30 percent less likely to have had depression in their lifetime, and those who had high levels of existential well-being were 70 percent less likely to have had depression than those who had low levels of existential well-being."
It just seems like the irony is that if we have evolved, somehow, we have evolved to function better with God ... a bit of a beggar for the no-god squad.
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
2 comments:
It sounds a bit like a circular argument to me.
Those who are not depressed are 70% less likely to be depressed than those who are... who kiddeth whom?
What is existential well-being but lack of depression, and vice versa.
Reality is an illusion caused by mescaline deficiency.
I was puzzling over whether there did seem to be a bit of having it both ways in the way the results were presented at one point. I suspect that this is a quirk of the reporting; but it's why I was a little more cautious in how I presented it. As to 'what is existential well-being', that's the kind of question to take to the article itself; however there seem to be fairly well established indices for such things. I was assuming that the article was using those. So probably not quite as tightly circular as you present it.
Post a Comment