This is something that thinking Christians should have a look at. Not because it hints at intellectual problems in neo-paganism as felt by its own practitioners, but rather because the kinds of issues are similar to Christians in the West. An indicator in my opinion that there is a cultural dimension to it. So have a look at this article: The North West Passage - The passing of Deo's Shadow. To give you a flavour of why I think it's worth reading is this rather fine paragraph: "Philosophical knowledge is the knowledge of how to separate the real from the unreal, the right from the wrong, the true from the false, the beautiful from the trite. This kind of knowledge is philosophical when it is a product of sustained systematic reason. This kind of knowledge, however, is often specifically rejected by pagans. This happens when, for instance, pagans claim that reliable knowledge can be obtained primarily (or only) through non-rational means such as magical sight, through 'gut intuition', etc. This also happens when someone says that 'head knowledge' or 'book knowledge' is worthless, and that intellectual reasoning about our problems is 'too hard', 'too scary', or 'missing the point', or even 'an obstacle to true spiritual experience'."
I recognise those reactions from some Christian circles.
It's very informative to read Deo's parting comment and also the comments on what he says. For my money he misses the 'obvious' point that his own schooling in certain perspectives in Western society probably informs his sense thet atheism is the natural non-religious 'home' point: that, in effect, he has merely recognised a long-standing conversion to that secular-humianist perspective. He talks of evidence as if it is unproblematic, like Dawkins. Time to brush off Kuhn and Popper, I think (by interesting co-incidence I was reading an article earlier that puts some of this nicely). So it's important for us to note the trajectory's tale in terms of the forces of spirituality, religion and culture more generally: back to plausibility structures. And while we're at it, we should perhaps also recall the attraction Buddhism seems to have for many in the West, and this article could be a good way in. However, it's interesting to note that the post-pagan traffic need not all be towards Prince Siddharta, in this one CS Lewis might feel vindicated.
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
2 comments:
Thank you for this. Your post, and the linked articles, have profound implications for a sicussion that that been emerging out of another blog post on abortion (Koinonia: Eugenics Are Now On the Table). I commented on that blog post trying to express my disquiet about the willingness of Christian anti-abortion campaigners to believe urban legends and thus undermine their cause. But at the root of it is the failure to appreciate differences in philosophy. The battle is not essentially political;, it is at the level of one's philosophy of the value of the human person -- and that, of course is where Christianity and Buddhism diverge radically. Part of the appeal of Buddhism in the post-Christian West is precisely that it first with theories of consciousness that deny that "there's anyone home".
I think I'll refer the other participants in that discussion to your post.
I agree that for a number of westerners the appeal of Buddhism probably resides in its theories of mind and its practice aiming to unpick the 'illusory' bonds of selfhood. I also think that this is the vital or crucial point of struggle for the gospel. I think that a Christian concept of selfhood recognises its reality but aims to overcome attachment by a realignment of the person to their true End rather than by seeking to dissolve the subject. This does seem to chime with postmodern concerns that the self is 'multiphrenic' to borrow Middleton and Walsh's term.
Post a Comment