Skip to main content

Ellul and Technology

For many years I have been reading bits and pieces of Ellul's work. I find myself drawn to his critique of the idolotry of technology or 'technique', and yet I keep finding myself unconvinced overall. For me there is resonance in the point that 'tech' is a bad master but can be a good servant. But I am not sure that some of the rhetoric actually makes an argument that seems to enlighten a genuine situation or enable us to live wisely with tech.

The linked article here Jacques Ellul and Technology's Trade-off | Comment Magazine is a helpful overview and contextualisation of this aspect of Ellul's work. And the final paragraph helps me to consider one reason why I tend to feel unconvinced by strands of Ellul's argument.

We can laugh and poke fun at technology (and its acolytes and worshippers); it is not god, not by a long shot. We can deliberately waste time having a beverage and long conversation now and then. Choosing to walk and cycle more and drive less, eating a more natural and less industrial diet, choosing not to submit our lives and our eventual deaths to the lordship of medical technology—these are other examples of practices in a life that is not centred on a sacralised technology and its value system. Technology is a good tool, but an unworthy god.
It helps my highlighting for me the partialness of the critique of tech. The article makes the point that Ellul prefers the term 'technique' to 'technology' (hence my use of 'tech' so as not to choose between them) and this is because he is trying to generalise and get away from particular technologies to finger the propensity to worship what our hands have fashioned. The problem that paragraph helps me to notice about this is that the crits are usually based on particular kinds of 'hi tech'. So notice in the suggestion of fasting from tech, 'cycle more' figures. And we might notice too a host of unnoted technologies: clothes, houses, roads etc. Perhaps it is because these don't generally figure in idolatrous attitudes? But if that is so, doesn't that undermine the critique of technique? And yet these unremarked technologies are hugely determinative of our ways of life and our attitudes, but not it ways that set off idolatry alarms.

Nevertheless, I think we do need to be aware of the way they do affect our living of our lives and how those effects influence attitudes, logics and values. But we don't have to assume that these effects will be unmitigatedly bad (or good). In the article we are told that Ellul claimed that he needn't look at the positive aspects of tech because it had enough supporters and worshippers doing that already. However, I do think that setting aside those goods gives the critique a lack of ability to help us live wisely with technology and rather ends up pushing us towards 'just say no'. And that attitude ends up being hypocritical because it inevitably ignores technologies which we have domesticated (such as clothes and cooking utensils).

We need an approach which also does what Andy Crouch does in Culture Making; seek to understand artefacts positively and negatively and then what Vanhoozer in Everyday Theology encourages us to do; to link our understanding of how artefacts function in various contexts to ideological and hegemonic concerns.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Foundation, Empire -and the mission of the church

 I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything but an outline and some character names. A lot has happened in my life since I read the series and now watch it adapted to television. For one thing, I committed my ways to Christ and have a role which involves official ministry in the church's mission. In the intervening years, a constant companion for me has been concern for ecology, for creation. Latterly this has become a more urgent concern and I have realised that we have collectively run out of time. We are living on borrowed time. In fact, some of us, globally speaking, are not even living on borrowed time. All through my adult life I have unconsciously (I now realise) assumed that we would have time, that there was time to persuade and to change and to head off the worst. That assumption, that naive hope, has now been stripped from me. The situation of living on borrowed time  needs t

Pray ceaselessly, but how?

I've just had an article published on emergingchurch.info. It's an adaptation of some of my book, but I thought I'd share it and give you a taster... ... ask ourselves whether there is a way of understanding the command to pray ceaselessly in a way that doesn't conflict with loving our neighbour. Paul may have meant his readers to pray as much as they could, whenever they could. However that would be to read a meaning into the text based, perhaps on a sense of realism faced with an understanding of prayer that involves giving God full and exclusive attention. We don't have to be bound by that interpretation. I'm going to suggest a deeper fulfilment of the exhortation. One that makes contact with Paul's command to his Roman readers to offer their bodies as living sacrifices to God (Romans 12.1-2). Perhaps Paul was suggesting making life into prayer rather than making prayer into a life emergingchurch.info > reflection > andii bowsher : Filed in: prayer

The Lords Prayer in Aramaic

I came across this a year or two back and was quite concerned that it was being purveyed as a translation when it quite clearly is not. Now my Hebrew is not extensive but enough that when combined with training in linguistics and biblical interpretation I can tell when a 'midrash' is being offered. [PS inserted here. Since I wrote this originally and noting that this post gets a lot of hits, I have continued to research and would like to encourage readers to visit more recent posts here and here and I tend to add thinngs from time to time to a Squidoo Lens dedicated to the topic of Aramaic Lord's prayer] Anyway, see for yourself the discrepancy between the quantity in the original and the English (as far as I can tell, the orthography is vaguely german, so 'j' is a 'y' sound etc.) The Prayer To Our Father (in the original Aramaic) Abwun "Oh Thou, from whom the breath of life comes, d'bwaschmaja who fills all realms of sound, light and vibration.