Skip to main content

Such a Mind as This

 Despite a lot of time spent trying to get people to recognise that our rational and cognitive life is only a part of what makes us who we are and -vitally- only a (often small) part of what we mobilise to inform our decisions and attitudes, it is nevertheless important to give it proper attention and make sure it is a (but not always 'the') central part in our outlook and action in the world. Hence, a book such as this is important to take notice of.

The writing makes use of many good sources which are deftly deployed having been well understood. So it seems a bit jarring that the exposition of the early chapters of Genesis reads as if the author is taking it as literal history. That's merely a minor irritant though as the theological points are often not dependent on this (and it may just be an artefact of taking the text as given in the way they write or assume closer-to-original hearer/readers would have understood it). I was also interested that the Augustinian interpretation of fall was taken as given and not given a more rigorous interrogation. I wondered how to recast the argument if one didn't treat the text as if it teaches a quasi physical change in the created order at the end of the Genesis 3 story. Is the argument still going to hold if one takes billions of years of development of the earth as fact? 

It was good to see an engagement with intertextuality and I found the exploration of the Abel/hebel 'pun' when reflecting on Qoheleth to be quite helpful -a way of reading the Abel-Cain story which brought insight. That said, I'm not sure how convinced I came away about the overall proposition at that point about a dependency or strong intertextuality between Genesis 3 and Ecclesiastes.

Personally, I found some of the discussion about Proverbs and Isaiah and Jeremiah quite hard going. There was a lot of detail abut text and vocabulary and it began to feel quite hard to understand where the individual points fitted in an overall argument.

There did seem to be a tendency to lean heavily on the binaries of wisdom and foolishness and their related terms in a way that appeared to serve a Chistian insider versus a non-Christian outsider. To the point where I was left with the impression that the message of Ecclesiastes \Qoheleth is meant to be understood as unwisdom and I wondered whether it would have been helpful to consider the question of what the book is doing in the canon of scripture -how does it function in context? Why would the rabbis at Yavneh towards the end of the year 70 uprising have included it as scripture and the Jewish and Christian communities have accepted it so? There are some really important questions about reading scripture that lurk around that matter.

I found myself reflecting, in the first half of the book, that it really is not as easy as that. The unwisdom of a lot of popular Christian output can contrast with the wisdom of some outside of the formal boundaries of Christian faith despite the former being avowedly rooted in 'the fear of the Lord' which is the 'beginning of wisdom'. What do we do about the tranches of God-fearing and Christ centred unwisdom all to easy to find today?

At this point I'm still reading it as it's not short. I will add to this review or post a part 2 once I've been able to read the second moiety of it.


Disclaimer: I received a copy of this book in exchange for reviewing it. There was and remains no pressure to review it favourably or otherwise.

Links

Such a Mind as This on Amazon
Richard L. Smith’s Website

Tag #SuchAMindAsThis

About the Author

Richard L. Smith received a Masters of Arts in Religion from Westminster Theological Seminary in 1992 and a Ph.D. in Historical Theology in 1996. From 1995 to 2001, he ministered in Prague, Czech Republic, with Global Scholars. Since 2010, Richard has lived and ministered in Buenos Aires, Argentina. and serves as a Senior Advisor for the Society of Christian Scholars . He manages a website and blog, Cosmovisión Bíblica (Biblical Worldview).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Foundation, Empire -and the mission of the church

 I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything but an outline and some character names. A lot has happened in my life since I read the series and now watch it adapted to television. For one thing, I committed my ways to Christ and have a role which involves official ministry in the church's mission. In the intervening years, a constant companion for me has been concern for ecology, for creation. Latterly this has become a more urgent concern and I have realised that we have collectively run out of time. We are living on borrowed time. In fact, some of us, globally speaking, are not even living on borrowed time. All through my adult life I have unconsciously (I now realise) assumed that we would have time, that there was time to persuade and to change and to head off the worst. That assumption, that naive hope, has now been stripped from me. The situation of living on borrowed time  needs t

Pray ceaselessly, but how?

I've just had an article published on emergingchurch.info. It's an adaptation of some of my book, but I thought I'd share it and give you a taster... ... ask ourselves whether there is a way of understanding the command to pray ceaselessly in a way that doesn't conflict with loving our neighbour. Paul may have meant his readers to pray as much as they could, whenever they could. However that would be to read a meaning into the text based, perhaps on a sense of realism faced with an understanding of prayer that involves giving God full and exclusive attention. We don't have to be bound by that interpretation. I'm going to suggest a deeper fulfilment of the exhortation. One that makes contact with Paul's command to his Roman readers to offer their bodies as living sacrifices to God (Romans 12.1-2). Perhaps Paul was suggesting making life into prayer rather than making prayer into a life emergingchurch.info > reflection > andii bowsher : Filed in: prayer

The Lords Prayer in Aramaic

I came across this a year or two back and was quite concerned that it was being purveyed as a translation when it quite clearly is not. Now my Hebrew is not extensive but enough that when combined with training in linguistics and biblical interpretation I can tell when a 'midrash' is being offered. [PS inserted here. Since I wrote this originally and noting that this post gets a lot of hits, I have continued to research and would like to encourage readers to visit more recent posts here and here and I tend to add thinngs from time to time to a Squidoo Lens dedicated to the topic of Aramaic Lord's prayer] Anyway, see for yourself the discrepancy between the quantity in the original and the English (as far as I can tell, the orthography is vaguely german, so 'j' is a 'y' sound etc.) The Prayer To Our Father (in the original Aramaic) Abwun "Oh Thou, from whom the breath of life comes, d'bwaschmaja who fills all realms of sound, light and vibration.