11 September 2006

Hackney wins logo case against Nike

It's hard to believe, isn't it? I can't imagine that Nike would not hesitate to take legal action against those who ripped off their logo and yet what was going on in their corporate heads when they thought they could use a local government logo without permission?
Nike, settling out of court, apologised to the east London borough and agreed to pay 300,000, including legal costs, after the US company produced a range of clothing bearing the area's name and an exact replica of the council's logo in the run-up to the World Cup.

As a spokesbeing for the council said,
Just because we are a public organisation, it does not mean that big corporations can take what they want from local people without asking.

Guardian Unlimited Business | | Hackney wins logo case against Nike:
Filed in: , , , ,

New tactics in battle against drug-resistant bacteria

This is interesting because it points to interesting implications for life more widely.
Colonies of bacteria use chemical signals to keep tabs on their numbers and, like an amassing army, only attack when their populations are large enough to ensure they will swamp a host's immune defences. The bacteria sense their numbers by the strength of the chemical signals they receive and as soon as they reach a certain threshold change behaviour dramatically, growing aggressively and turning on virulence genes to cause infection. Many bacterial colonies also set up defences by secreting a mucus-like substance which forms a slimy, protective "biofilm" around them, making them nearly impervious to antibiotics.

This means that if we can find a way to disrupt the signalling systems, the bacteria don't become a co-ordinated 'army'. I'm minded of the way that agglomarations of humans move from being a crowd to being a mob or an organisation. Clearly our signalling systems are involved. If my intuition is right that we should be thinking of the transition from crowd to organisation as the genesis of a 'principality', then part of our struggle against principalities and powers could be about disrupting signalling systems...
Guardian Unlimited | Science | New hope raised in battle against drug-resistant bacteria:
Filed in: , , , ,

Simple String Lord's Prayer Things

Over the summer I was finding a modicum of interest in the Lord's prayer knotted cords I've been using and occasionally promoting. So I've decided to make them more widely available ... Simple string Lord's prayer thing
Filed in: , , , , , , , ,

Simple string Lord's prayer thing

Over the summer I was finding a modicum of interest in the Lord's prayer knotted cords I've been using and occasionally promoting. So I've decided to make them more widely available ... Simple string Lord's prayer thing
Filed in: , , , , , , , ,

10 September 2006

Feelings Matter Less To Teenagers, Neuroscientist Says

Dt's a bit of brain research that confirms the idea of developmental aspects to moral reasoning. It's bound to have implications for teachig, particularly the teaching of religion. But I guess that youth workers need to clock it too.
Dr. Sarah-Jayne Blakemore of the UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience,... said: "Thinking strategies change with age. As you get older you use more or less the same brain network to make decisions about your actions as you did when you were a teenager, but the crucial difference is that the distribution of that brain activity shifts from the back of the brain (when you are a teenager) to the front (when you are an adult). The fact that teenagers underuse the medial pre-frontal cortex when making decisions about what to do, implies that they are less likely to think about how they themselves and how other people will feel as a result of their intended action. We think that a teenager's judgement of what they would do in a given situation is driven by the simple question: 'What would I do?'. Adults, on the other hand, ask: 'What would I do, given how I would feel and given how the people around me would feel as a result of my actions?' The fact that teenagers use a different area of the brain than adults when considering what to do suggests they may think less about the impact of their actions on other people and how they are likely to make other people feel."

I will have to consider further how it affects thing, I'm still thinking about it and trying to match it and map it to the observed behaviour of teenagers I know, including my own. And I'm trying to recall my own teenaged years in an attempt to feel around the idea from the inside, so to speak. First response is that 'they are less likely to think about how they themselves and how other people will feel as a result of their intended action' might relate to that alleged tendency of the young to be very black and white about morality and the tendency of aging supposedly to make one more woolly because more in touch with the way others may feel about it.
This would fit with ...
"It seems that adults might be better at putting themselves in other people's mental shoes and thinking about the emotional impact of actions -- but further analysis is required. The relative difficulty that teenagers have could be down to them using a different strategy when trying to understand someone else's perspective, perhaps because the relevant part of the brain is still developing. The other factor to consider is that adults have had much more social experience."

So, more study needed but intriguing eh?

ScienceDaily: Feelings Matter Less To Teenagers, Neuroscientist Says:
Filed in: , , , , ,

09 September 2006

Better late than never

In the early 80's I worked in a wholefood shop. We used to pack our food into biodegradable plasic bags. I'm really glad that a start is being made to make this more 'normal':
Starting this week, the supermarket [Sainsbury's] will use compostable packaging instead of plastic for almost half of its organic fruit and vegetable products, rising to 80% by January. The scheme will extend to all Sainsbury's ready meals by September 2007. The company's compostable packaging consists of maize, sugar-cane or starch so it can naturally break down in a garden compost heap and need not be binned and sent to a landfill.
I hope it'll spread, I really like the idea of being able to put even more in the composter. Our bin waste will dwindle to virtually zero if the plastic gets compostable.

Full house as leading 9/11 conspiracy theorist has his say

I am skeptical about this, though I know that there is enough in my reaction to warrant a challenge from 1Cor.13:4-7 'love ... does not delight in evil ..." However, what intrigues me is what this tells me about Western culture at the moment.
36% of Americans believed it "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that their government was involved in allowing the attacks or had carried them out itself. There are many people in the UK who agree with them. The theories as to what happened on that day, when almost 3,000 people were killed, differ but their unifying theme is that a neo-conservative cabal within the US government staged the events as a pretext to wage wars, become a dominant force in the world and establish "the new American century". The attacks, it is said, were not carried out by al-Qaida terrorists but were a "false flag" event used to justify invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

The fact that this is so easy to believe for so many people is also alarming for what it tells us about the apparent trustworthiness of governments.
Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Full house as leading 9/11 conspiracy theorist has his say:
Filed in: , , ,

Review: It happened in Hell

 It seemed to me that this book set out to do two main things. One was to demonstrate that so many of our notions of what goes under the lab...