This is a case of how a headline can seem more alarmist than the content of the article, becasue when you read you find that there are still this issues to be addressed:
"� 'How might new stations be financed?
� What kind of government support might be necessary for new build to take place?
� How far would new build be consistent with our market framework for energy?
� How best to secure public acceptance?
� How far would we need to resolve the long outstanding issue of finding a final depository for high level nuclear waste, as a pre-condition for progressing new build?'"
So not really 'plans' then, eh? More like discussions; nothing new there then. What's the purpose of this report? I can't decide whether it's to soften us up to accept Nuke power refurb and new build or to try to galvanise oposition ...
The Observer | Business | Secret papers reveal new nuclear building plan:
No comments:
Post a Comment