10 August 2005

Godcasting; the persistance of the monologue

"'religious and spiritually themed podcasts' - have become 'the most popular use of the new online technology since it debuted less than a year ago'. They 'range from a daily dose of Scripture to a weekly dose of the Bible translated into Klingon', continued Lee, who explained that 'the vast majority are Christian-based, but they also include New Age, Jewish and Buddhist podcasts.'"
Perhaps it's because talk is cheap and easy (?) but those of us who are skeptical of the educational value of reliance on the monological sermon need to note this and let it encourage us to take seriously that there is still a place for imparting information verbally. But let the defenders of the status quo note that 'one swallow does not a summer make' (especially in Britain!); the convenience and cheapness of verbal media does not overturn huge quantities of research that indicates learning is better achieved by a greater emphasis on other learning methodologies, especially where one is dealing with people who have not submitted themselves to learning the skills associated with lecture learning. I note that the main examples of 'Godcasting' are for things that would be 'short burst'.

There's a humerous side too:
"Non-believers, meanwhile, can take comfort from the fact that, while listening to the Good News through earphones, even the most zealous happy-clappy is reduced to silence."
and
(mostly speeches by Buddhist religious leaders). "Interested listeners can also download meditations but," she said, "they are just a lot of dead air.
Guardian Unlimited | Online | And The Word is: Godcasting:

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

A thought. Should the uptake of Godcasting be viewed exclusively through the lens of Emerging Church? Some blogs I've read seem to create this impression. But does a pastor's technological capacity to Godcast automatically make him an emerging church leader? I can't help but notice that the Emergent-No crowd us the exact same medium as the Pro-Emergent community to express themselves - blogs! Before claiming this Godcasting phenomena for our own maybe we should be accessing it critically. Your comments on monologue are well noted.

Andii said...

Personally I don't think that the use of a technology makes someone 'emergent', if any thing Godcasting seems to me to be old-paradigm/new-tech. I would say that this is because it does seem so biased to the monologic that modernism is so into. I don't want to claim Godcasting is 'emergent' at all, and I'm skeptical that it is a technology that is inherently conducive to the concerns of emerging cultures; certainly not as used in Godcasting as currently practiced.

Christian England? Maybe not...

I've just read an interesting blog article from Paul Kingsnorth . I've responded to it elsewhere with regard to its consideration of...