The title gives hope of action that means many people won't have to change their eating habits. However, I think that a little more thought gives us, in fact, another reason for not eating (much) meat if one is at all concerned about reducing your global-warming quotient. "Farmed ruminant animals are thought to be responsible for up to a quarter of 'man-made' methane emissions worldwide though, contrary to common belief, most gas emerges from their front, not rear, ends."
It goes like this; less meat eaten (and dairy products too) translates to less ruminant-born methane production and so less of a huge contributor to global warming (like it's massively more insulating than carbon dioxide).
So don't wait for the technical fix: it'll be years in coming; reduce or eliminate your meat and dairy intake straight away and you'll help save tons of the stuff.
Move to cut methane emissions by changing cows' diet | Climate change | Guardian Unlimited Environment:
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Science And Spirituality Of Addiction
What drew me in was the collocation of science and spirituality in the title. I'm also a little interested in addiction through having ...
-
Interesting insight into the Muslim world: my favourite progresive muslim site has been hacked and attacked by islamists accusing those who ...
-
This book is one that I now seriously consider recommending to the student Christian groups I'm in touch with whose basis is Evangelic...
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
No comments:
Post a Comment