Hmmm. What does a poll like this one really indicate? "Francis Collins, former head of the Human Genome Project (and onetime atheist), rejects the notion that science is sufficient to disprove the existence of God. Biologist Richard Dawkins, aka Darwin's Rottweiler, insists that anyone who believes in an omnipotent creator is suffering a 'delusion.' Can the gloves of God defeat the punch of proof? "
The readership will determine the result. I would guess that the people who read Wired are more likely to have a certain opinion already on the issue. So all this is doing is registering the relative plausibility of the statements to a largely atheist/agnostic constituency. Interesting, though, to look at the figures for each statement.
Wired Geekipedia: Faith Smackdown - Gloves of God vs. Punch of Proof:
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Science And Spirituality Of Addiction
What drew me in was the collocation of science and spirituality in the title. I'm also a little interested in addiction through having ...
-
Interesting insight into the Muslim world: my favourite progresive muslim site has been hacked and attacked by islamists accusing those who ...
-
This book is one that I now seriously consider recommending to the student Christian groups I'm in touch with whose basis is Evangelic...
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
No comments:
Post a Comment