Showing posts with label future. Show all posts
Showing posts with label future. Show all posts

19 February 2024

Futuring formation in a climate of turbulence

Intro

This is a paper I wrote for a recent gathering of people involved in thinking about spiritual accompaniment in our region.

Reading Jane Shaw's volume, I was struck what a different world it addresses. Not only is my class background not really represented (it's all seems quite middle/upper class). I was largely left feeling that this is spiritual practice that seems quite detached from much of the lived reality of the nation that I read recently about in The People [The Rise and Fall ofthe Working Class 1910-2010]. The exception is to some extent is Percy Dearmer. These are people also who lived and worked in a world also where CO2 was below 350ppm (it’s now 420+) and the climate was still the relatively stable holocene we came to know and mostly love (yes, even in Britain!)

My fear is that to continue to think along the same trajectory as these mid-20th century pioneers would be to isolate Christian spirituality from the most important and momentous features of what is now underway. Gaia Vince puts that into perspective as she asks:

"Where are you at with your five stages of grief for the Holocene? That’s the geological epoch we were living in for the past 11,700 years – the period of time when humans invented agriculture, built cities, invented writing, became “modern”, essentially. All of history took place in this epoch, marked by its congenial, relatively predictable climate, in which ice sheets retreated from Europe and North America, and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were high enough to enable the flourishing of grains, like rice and wheat." Now we’ve left those Holocene conditions for the uncharted Anthropocene, an age brought about by human activities and characterised by global climate chaos and ecological degradation...  find myself experiencing all stages simultaneously. Anger that my children won’t get to snorkel the wondrous coral reefs of my Australian childhood; pain and guilt over the millions of Indian villagers displaced by floodwaters, losing their homes, livelihoods, even their lives. Depression over the scale of loss: of wildlife, of glaciers, of verdant landscapes, of safe, reliable weather. It is the last two stages we need to reach – acceptance and reconstruction – if we are to build a livable Anthropocene."  https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/18/heatwave-floods-save-planet-children

 So it does seem important to me to parallel the recent COP28 Global Stocktake with a  taking stock of what lies ahead and what it will mean for churches and Christians to respond well in order to understand, coram Deo, the kinds of communities and people we need to be; with our glocal neighbours and recognising we are [part of] the ecosystems that we rely on for sustenance.

“We must try to understand the meaning of the age in which we are called to bear witness. We must accept the fact that this is an age in which the cloth is being unwoven. It is therefore no good trying to patch. We must, rather, set up the loom on which coming generations may weave new cloth according to the pattern God provides.” (Mother Mary Clare SLG)

Where the climate crisis is causing distress and eco-anxiety, we have the opportunity to ground ourselves in a theology of a God intimately involved in creation – the God who created us, dwells in us (‘us’ including the natural world), and will meet us at our end. -JR Hollins: https://joannahollins.wordpress.com/2023/07/18/the-vicar-or-the-ground-source-heater/

What lies ahead?

It now seems we cannot avoid a minimum of 1.5°C for several decades. This will shift ecological zones, expand deserts, melt large amounts of polar ice, raise sea levels by metres not just the few centimeters we’ve seen so far. It will result in fiercer rain and storms. In turn this will imperil food security. These things will increase tensions in human society, promote migration, there will be wars and rumours of war. The darker angels of our nature will find greater opportunity to ride forth.

We are already seeing the emergence of the conditions of and for a neo-feudalism and a rentier basis for economies being laid down by TNCs and their billionaire owners.

We are already seeing the rise of the political reflexes of that economic shift.

While not inevitable, this path is likely. What we do now in the next 5-10 years is of deadly importance -I use that adverb with forethought!

………………………………………………………………………………

 

TAKE A BREATH -notice our own reactions, hold them before God …

 

This is a vital part of the work of God right now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

The time for declaring emergency and working for sustainability was 40 years ago. Now our sector [conservation] must focus on being collapse-aware, to aim for ruggedisation and to build a regenerative culture. …. This means anticipating, facing and responding to the linked crises of ecological and climate breakdown, pandemics, rising inequalities, displacement, famines & conflict. … Earth crisis, for short. … Where society is competitive, where there is a lack of shared responsibility, and where heritage isn’t cherished as a commons, collapse is more likely to lead to conflict and displacement. … From <https://bridgetmckenzie.uk/sustainability-is-in-the-past>

Meeting what lies ahead

I suggest that Christians and churches will need to consider upping our game and preparing for action in these missional responses.

Churches *should* have a vital role in the short to medium terms:

·       helping to build community resilience;

·       offering help  for people to learn new skills;

·        providing pastoral care to the anguished, shocked and regretful;

·       truth seeking and telling in the face of disinformation and denial;

·       offering spiritual accompaniment as people re-orient lives around sustainable practices;

·       making known and exemplifying the riches of spiritual practice to support simple lifestyles and neighbourliness. (And be learning and re-learning all of that ourselves)[i].

These feel somehow monastic. It is also vital and necessary. There are movements afoot already to promote and foment these things. Christians should surely be among them.

What spiritual perspectives support these 'missions'?

Grounding in natural world: we know that there are strands of Christian spirituality that value and rejoice in creation; we need to lean into them but in a way that doesn’t denigrate the urban per se. We should also widen our thinking about incarnation to more thoroughly incorporate (!) understanding that the flesh is matter, imbricated in ecosystems. (We might note and theologise about the way being in nature supports good mental health.)

Preferential option for the poor. Hopefully I don’t need to say more about this?!

Joy in enough, simplification (new Franciscanism?) and rejoining our lives and life-systems to the circular economies of nature. Yes, let’s consider the lilies and the birds how they are supported and support life around them.

Learning the insights of protest movements especially: undoing hierarchy; valuing each; self and other care; listening; (cf Quaker decision making);

It is important that we help the development of a Missio Dei perspective -implied spiritual disciplines of (corporate) attention, discernment and reflection; together and individually. We can use the Five marks of mission to help draw our attention to where to look for God at work.

We have been seeing the way that money buys social perception filters and narrative hegemony. Ctr "You shall know the truth and it will set you free" -rediscovering intellectual humility and valuing truth-seeking -disciplines of study, valuing not bearing false witness, courage in challenging untruths, half-truths and evasions, telling truth to power.

 One of the tests of actual faith, as opposed to bad religion, is whether it stops you ignoring things. Faith is most fully itself and most fully life-giving when it opens your eyes and uncovers for you a world larger than you thought - and of course, therefore, a world that's a bit more alarming than you ever thought. The test of true faith is how much it lets you see, and how much it stops you denying, resisting, ignoring aspects of what is real.     -Rowan Williams quoted in A Splash of Words" by Mark Oakley

 Humility in mission: it is God’s mission, God’s agenda we seek. Too often in the past the churches have tried to own and badge efforts for justice and reform. Too often we have been rivalrous with others. But it is God’s work, we can be content with doing right and good things even if it doesn't have ‘Brought to you by the CofE’ in the corner. Too often we have been arrogant and failed to listen and so we’ve missed the Spirit blowing gently and unexpectedly in the lives and circumstances of others -the sheep not of this fold.

 Courage:

 "In a time of overlapping global crises, it’s clear that radical courage will be required of us as individuals and as a society - in our communities and institutions at local and national levels, and not least among those in public life - if we are to make decisive progress on our interconnected economic, environmental and social challenges, and create truly just and flourishing futures ... That will require at least two things: the willingness to step out of our comfort zones and into the storms and waves, to protect the poor, the vulnerable and nature itself, and a clear sense of where to find the resources beyond ourselves to discover that courage." -Justin Welby

 Re-learning hope: not as optimism or wishful thinking or escapist eschatology. We can no longer work for a better world, only a less-worse one (accompanying people in bereavement from modernist progressive optimism). Hope as a humble sustaining of work with God in the world and among God’s people, simply knowing /trusting that “our work in the Lord is not in vain”

Finding spiritual perspectives that help us to deal with complicity. BLM and the current climate/enviro crises remind us how we are deeply formed and held in life-patterns and attitudes that do not serve wider human flourishing. Understanding corporate sin and our participation in it in ways that help us to live wisely ourselves and to minister to others, is vitally important. I personally believe that this is where conversations about sin and atonement ought to be circling. Not to mention liturgy and theological formation.

What does "holy and righteous life" look like in these conditions?

As well as regular attentive reflection on the world around us -human and more-than-human; as well as discernment of God’s mission and our own vocations within it; as well as meeting together for mutual encouragement and upbuilding … we will need to consider some marks of a holy and righteous life that we have not paid so much attention to over the last century (or maybe I’m wrong?)

·       Resilience through facing despair, complicity and world-view bereavement with gentleness, truthfulness and Godly neighbour love.

·       Peacemaking

·       Community building /Mutual aid to try to nurture resilience against the threats of divisive rhetoric and selfish responding to crisis. It will also enable the kind of working together that will actually save lives and enable human and ecological flourishing

·       Casting down the mighty and lifting up the lowly

·       Bearing witness to truth

·       Dealing wisely with complicity

·       NVDA, Civil disobedience

·       21st century alms-giving that recognises structural dimensions of alleviating want.

As I mention these things, I’m so often aware that there are precursors. Christians in past times of civilisational change and collapse have done many of these things in various ways. Often it has been monastic and mendicant orders who have been at the forefront….

Over to you....

[i]From < https://www.facebook.com/groups/2349278635285005/?multi_permalinks=3536698376543019&notif_id=1691680506613098&notif_t=group_activity&ref=notif

25 July 2012

A Future of Undergraduate Teaching

In various fora, I've been doing a lot of discussing and thinking about this lately and I think that this scenario is very likely.
 ... most teaching in the early years of an undergraduate degree will gradually cease to be via lectures and will instead take the form of online presentations produced by professionally trained presenters backed up by teams of academics. This online content will be paralleled by peer tuition (or teaching by questioning) which, when done well, is clearly effective (see here and here), and the associated growth of so-called learning analytics. Lectures may well become special occasions in which the best-known academics make their presence felt. Meanwhile, small group teaching will make a come-back in all years, especially in the best universities.
We've been saying for years that lectures are not a good way to learn except for a minority for whom it resonates with their learning style. And when we take on board the critique of our education system more generally that it is a huge university entrance system predicated on forming traditional research academics, then in GB it really is likely that the new fee regime is going to concentrate pedagogical minds on androgogical matters (though I prefer a term like mathetogogical). That is assuming that we are able to effect a culture change in British culture more widely to take away the prejudice that the only form of 'education' worth having is precisely invested in the system to produce research academics (even though simultaneously that is derided)

The fact is that HEI's will have to think hard about just what it is that they are 'selling'. I think that part of the answer will be 'accreditation' (largely about summative assessment and benchmarking) and another will be formative assessment and learning coaching.

The question in a barebones version of that future is about the way that those less able to access learning resources (including the human ones) of a traditional-ish form will be enabled to access it. Or will the 'total package' including access to counselling and other support services remain a kind of gold-standard?

The Future of Undergraduate Teaching - WorldWise - The Chronicle of Higher Education:

17 August 2010

The Future of Faith

Harvey Cox who is a well-known theologian speaking about how he sees the future of faith. You'll need just over 50 minutes to hear all of the video including about 25-30 minutes for the questions and answers which are worth hearing. However, if you want to get a sense of what is covered, here are my notes.

There are 3 Main points (related to Cox's book The Future of Faith)
1. predictions of demise of religion were premature and we can expect religion to be around for a good while yet.

2. We are witnessing a fundamental change in what religiousness means. (In past overestimated the benefits of modernity (Progress?); 20th century disproved the optimistic modernisation thesis. Also underestimated the ability of religions to adapt to changing times). Particularly
(a) the 'experiential turn' (foregrounding encounter rather than teaching) which is affecting all religions globally. Eg Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity.
(b) change to a more porous/open relationship between religions: Eg RC woman who goes to mass, a Pentecostal choir, yoga and has books by the Dalai Lama. Borrowing.
(c) focus: away from next-life to this-life

3. Fundamentalism is declining and will continue to do so. Term reapplied from Christianity to other religious movements in Judaism, Islam etc. It has hard time coping with the general pluralism in societies globally.

Christianity is entering the most exciting phase in its history. It is now beginning to have a majority of non-western followers for whom (an experience of) Jesus rather than doctrine is most central. Also, discoveries at eg Nag Hammadi, which have emphasised the variety and plurality of early Christianity before imperial centralisation, is beginning to affect and reinforce the experiential turn.

Questions and disputations
Belief ctr faith: Belief is about assent; faith about loyalty (etymologically). Belief often implies lack of surety while faith indicates a direction of life.
Three ages:
1. Pre-Constantinian ('Age of Faith' -?)
2. Age of Belief (post-Constantinian) where Christianity meant asssenting to a creed or creeds.
3. Age of the Spirit (now-ish) reconciliation, unity and wholistic perspectives come to the fore. Analogies in Judaism, Islam, Buddhism.
The issue is how to be in touch with the sacred without the packaging: an awareness of how our symbols and talking are imperfect and provisional.

Re RCC, Pope etc
RCC is showing up a dramatic out-playing of the changes being discussed above. Important figures from 20C RCC: John XXIII and aggiornamento -Vatican II. Thomas Merton who died in a Buddhist monastery. Dorothy Day: Catholic Workers' Movement and serving the poor etc. Oscar Romero drew attention to preferential option for the poor. Benedict seems to have the idea that he needs to 'circle the wagons': defendable and clear articulation of RC faith. He sees secularising Europe, Latin American RCC haemorraging to pentecostalism and Liberation theology and in N.Am lay people asking for a say in church governance. His response seems to be defensive and rallying non-RCs who empathise with 'circling the wagons' hence invitation to Anglicans.
Cox thinks this approach will be self-defeating:. note. for example, married priests coming in from Anglican dissent .... !!!

Family resemblances of fundamentalisms
reaching back, retrieving and redeploying some element of tradition into present day. Changelessness is sought.
All fight a war on two fronts: one is against a secular world, the other is against 'accommodationist' or dissenting co-religionists.
Also share a suspicion in positions of leadership.

Evidence for declining fundamentalism?
Taliban in Afghanistan are increasingly distrusted where they are mainly about violence because they seem unable to build social and economic life in communities. In Iran, the violent response to demands for greater say in governance indicates insecurity.

Human Interest - The Future of Faith - Book TV

Now I'm not as sure as he is about declining fundamentalism, though I do think that he is right to point to the way that the need for positive and constructive engagement with real people, community-building and global citizenship tends to mollify and chasten hardline ideologues -even when the ideology is religious.

I think I would add into the mix concerning 'fundamentalisms' that many of them gain their energy from people who seem to be looking for fights; looking for ways to feel better about themselves by metaphorically spitting on other people. There are some interesting mental gymnastics that have to be done to hold that impetus sealed from the core of most religious traditions which really do lie with respect, love, compassion etc.

I have various ideas about how we should respond to the challenges ahead. I broadly agree that the wholistic impetus is part of a global culture thing that we need to take note of and think how to articulate Christian faith in relation to. The first bite at that gave us a lot of 'New Age' stuff, but that fails to hold onto the distinctive things that characterise Christian faith (and often other faiths too, save, perhaps, some Hindu traditions) and produce a variety of religious expressions that are, in effect, something new and not recognised or 'owned' by any religious traditions thus failing in their unitive or reconciliatory aims.

I have various thoughts about this, but not time to develop them here. Hopefully I'll get to write more in due course about re-playing Christian faith in the key of wholism.

Feast of Fools: Theological Essay on Festivity and Fantasy

15 August 2010

Future-Church-Scenarios

While I think that these scenarios are underspecified I do think that they capture things that are likely and in many cases could apply over here and not just in the USA. In fact I would say that I recognise all 4 in church life here and I am actively considering or actually involved (either previously, presently or looking to) in 2 or 3 of them.

I think futuring is an important way forward in our planning and strategising. Don't get hung up on the theological issue of whether God has a relatively open future for us or whether God is into meticulous providence; interesting though that is it is not the practical issue here. Unless we have particular revelation (like Agabus's prophecy in Acts), the between-the-times norm holds: we are to plan to do what we are called to do and to use our nous in service of the Kin-dom of God. The Lord on return expects us to be busy in his service, not waiting around ... And any of us who use insurance should recognise that we are already bought into the future scenarios thing.
Church-Futures.com:-Future-Church-Scenarios

USAican RW Christians misunderstand "socialism"

 The other day on Mastodon, I came across an article about left-wing politics and Jesus. It appears to have been written from a Christian-na...