I have to confess that Scientology has not really been on my radar: it is not widely practiced (though with some high profile members, admittedl) and its beliefs are about as bizarre as you can get. I read science fiction, but I really don't think that most of it stands up to scientific scrutiny. And also, frankly, I've tended to distrust an organisation apparently started by someone with little moral character and who wrote what appears at the end of this section quoted from the referenced article.
"organised religions can be very lucrative - as L. Ron Hubbard himself recognised.
Giant photographs of Hubbard adorn the new London headquarters, and his many pronouncements (such as 'Man is basically good and it is this basic goodness we want to set free') are stencilled on walls.
A comment you won't find displayed, though, is the one Hubbard made to an author's convention before he invented Scientology.
'Writing for a penny a word,' he said, 'is ridiculous. If a man really wants to make a million dollars he should start his own religion.' Basic introductory sessions for Scientology cost up to £80. Then there is another course which costs £300, then another..."
The other thing this raises for me though, is that my initial reactions to Scientology, be they well-founded or otherwise, seem perhaps not so dissimilar to how people see my 'religion' (though to be fair, few people see Jesus as a charlatan). It gives me a glimpse into how distrust of the institutional may feel when we are looking at religion. Heck, why should people give churches the benefit of the doubt? It also looks to me like if anyone is looking for the subject of a conspiracy theory, these are the guys.
And on the other hand, the money made seems to indicate that there is a hunger that is being tapped into. Perhaps we Christians should note and offer free alternatives or more 'subsidised' courses on personal and spiritual growth. And what are the ethics of such enterprises?
Still thinking but any clues ...
'Tom Cruise's Church of hate tried to destroy me' | the Daily Mail:
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Showing posts with label scientology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scientology. Show all posts
19 May 2007
14 May 2007
Scientology and that angry outburst
John Sweeney has my sympathy. I have sometimes felt as angry as he obviously did when someone is asserting untruths and apparently willfully misunderstanding or refusing to hear what I have to say. Not recommended as a tactic, but, as I say, understandable. Here's the BBC's own report as I saw it this morning. I've never really given Scientology much thought before, I just can't begin to believe their mythos, but now I think I may watch, after all.
YouTube - BBC reporter losing it (unedited) + BBC defense
Technorati Tags: BBC, Scientology,
YouTube - BBC reporter losing it (unedited) + BBC defense
Technorati Tags: BBC, Scientology,
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The Science And Spirituality Of Addiction
What drew me in was the collocation of science and spirituality in the title. I'm also a little interested in addiction through having ...
-
Interesting insight into the Muslim world: my favourite progresive muslim site has been hacked and attacked by islamists accusing those who ...
-
Some readers will recall that I'm keen in principle on a thorough review of the way we do dioceses in the CofE. I'm not starry-eyed...
-
This book is one that I now seriously consider recommending to the student Christian groups I'm in touch with whose basis is Evangelic...