31 May 2012

The Bank of England ruined

Earlier this evening I attended a lecture in which a picture of this painting was shown.

It is by an architectural artist called Joseph Gandy. The image really grabbed me. Some of what grabbed me I found  picked up in a Guardian article about the artist.
Gandy painted a fantasy view of the Bank of England - Soane's proudest work - in ruins. The City of London is imagined as a swampy wilderness, as desolate as the Roman Forum in the dark ages. It is the earliest example in Europe of a drawing in which an architect imagines a structure he has built as a ruin. At one level, it is a meditation on the future of the British Empire. Babylon and Memphis, Carthage, Athens, and Rome ... why not London?
This picture is beautiful in its craftsmanship but it also appeals to the part of me that loves the 'what if...' that lies behind much sci-fi. But I noted that the slide told us that it was painted in 1830 when the British Empire was really getting into its swing -the financial heart would be this building. But then I realised that this picture does something else that I tend to appreciate in a good sci-fi story: it relativises human pretensions; we are confronted with the reminder that 'this too shall pass'; that all our grand achievements are insignificant, transitory; vanitas vanitorum; kol hebel. And as Empire gains strength, this painting seems to say, prophetically, "Fallen is Babylon ..."

GloboChrist

GloboChrist: The Great Commission Takes a Postmodern Turn (Church and Postmodern Culture): Carl A. Raschke: Amazon.co.uk: Books

30 May 2012

Body image problems -not so new, perhaps

I don't doubt that there are a lot of people many of them young who have emotional difficulties which are related to the attitudes of peers, parents, and what they pick up of such attitudes in the media they access. And I am truly concerned that there are young children who feel really badly about their bodies. We, as a society, need to consider how best to order our life together to minimise this kind of message becoming something that leads to self-harming. It was on the BBC news this morning and also here -
Girls aged five worry about their body image, say MPs | Society | The Guardian and follows the publication of a parliamentary report.

One of the report's authors says: "It's clear there's something seriously wrong in society when children as a young as five are worrying about their appearance, based on the messages they are seeing all around them. The findings of the report are shocking – body image has become more important in our culture than health and children are mimicking their parents' concerns about appearance. We all have a responsibility to act now to bring about the attitudinal and behavioural change that's necessary to prevent damage to future generations"
What I would like to question (and I've not yet read the report which may deal with this) is whether this is more an intensification of something that has been going on for a long time. Perhaps the new thing about it could be how 'predatory' it has become. I mean predatory in the sense of a targetting by advertisers and other opinion formers of younger people with age-inappropriate stuff.

What makes me think that it isn't so new in principle is my own experience. As an 8-year old boy I can distinctly remember two interacting issues being a part of my life. One was reading comics of the superhero genre; especially Spider-Man. The other issue was that I was very thin (mostly as a result of having thin bones). The problem I had with these two things together was that I was taking in images on a regular basis of male bodies which were well muscled, though not body-builder beefy, and graceful (lovingly drawn?) This male body shape filled my imaginative space and what I take to be my mimetic instinct drew me towards a desire to be something like that image. But it was never going to happen -I realised eventually but before it did too much damage to me physically or mentally (some may question this!) that I was simply not made of the right basic physical architecture to have a body like that. I spent time in my own head working on compensatory thinking and coping mechanisms.

I realise that not every child is able -for a variety of reasons- to do what I did or to do it effectively. And perhaps the saturation of our cultural environment with such images makes it just more statistically likely that the coping threshold of a greater proportion of children will be breached.

Add to that peer pressure: my experience again was being about the thinnest kind of body type possible while remaining healthy attracted quite a lot of negative comment from peers and could occasion being bullied. Add to that my inability to tan and reddish hair and I had some really quite unpleasant insults and negativity thrown my way. I believe that this did dent my self-esteem and I compensated by finding things that I could do better than most and by realising (which stood me in good stead in later study) that there was an arbitrariness to the values placed on various aspects of appearance and that I could choose to value things about myself even if lots of other people didn't appear to appreciate them. Again, I don't think that this is a strategy that may be easy for many nowadays.

I suppose what I'm hypothesising is that body image concern amongst young people are not uncommon but that this makes it more important that we don't make something so prevalent and intimately personal yet socially visible more difficult to navigate through to reasonably healthy conclusions involving self-acceptance and being able to make healthy choices. We need to make a cultural intervention which works on several fronts. I would agree that tackling the torrent of images poured into public spaces and media would be one thing. However, I'd also say we need to be prepared to coach people to be able to reprogramme their own valuings of body images and their own self-acceptance. Then there is the issue of encouraging and enabling social environments of acceptance, valuing of difference, respect and care for others. To many kids the taunts of peers are a big thing -we should not belittle the hurt and harm they can do.

This much is congruent with Christian concerns.
However, I wonder too whether we should consider the maimed crucified body as a theological resource here too? The prophetic words 'He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.' (Is.53.2) were applied by early Christians to Jesus. The incarnation was not marked by great beauty or 'comeliness'. Maybe that doesn't go quite as far as saying that the Incarnate One had body image problems, but it is to say that he may not have exacerbated them for others or alienated the not-so-comely like most of us are in fact. We should note, though, that in experiencing rejection, betrayal, taunting and so forth, he did experience the kinds of things that those who are denigrated for their bodily 'imperfections' experience. ...

27 May 2012

Pentecost and Babel: needs Ascension


The Babel story relates to Ascension/Pentecost but not straightforwardly: the tower of Babel is a story of an attempt to reach up to heaven. It results in the confusion of tongues. 
At the start of 2Theophilus (let the reader understand) Jesus ascends to heaven and this leads to the gift of tongues. Without considering the Ascension, trying to say that Pentecost is a kind of reversal of Babel seems a bit overblown. But seen through and from Ascension it can make some sense. In the Babel story, the attempt to Empire is resisted and undermined by diversity. In the Pentecost story, the diversity is affirmed. It results from a will not to dominate, but rather to co-operate.


In the Babel story it's interesting to ask who the 'we' are who wish to 'make a name for ourselves'. Certainly not the serfs and slaves living under a state whose mythology implicitly declares that this is their lot: they are made from the offal of defeated gods and have been made to work and particularly for the representatives of the gods (the kings and priests). This is Empire; co-opting the labour and resources of others for the aggrandisement of those at the centre; this is 'making a name for ourselves'. In such a context 'nothing will be impossible for them' becomes a chilling possibility of ever more demeaning and effective means to exploit and dehumanise. By contrast God's 'judgement' is one that de-centralises and re-humanises by forcing things to a smaller scale: Empire is cut down to size. God, it would seem, prefers subsidiarity. This gift of tongues in Genesis restores the trajectory towards diversity that Genesis traces to the command to fill the earth. This gift of tongues is actually blessing rather than curse. However, for those resisting God's purposes, a restoration of blessing may actually be felt as judgement.
Christ is given the name that is "above every name" (Phil. 2:9) and declared to be the ruler of heaven and earth. The Ascension is the seal and symbol of this. Jesus doesn't make a name for himself but is given the Name ... So: in Babel self-appointed representatives of humanity grasp at divine honours and control of humanity to the ill of the many. In the Ascension, a God-appointed representative of humanity is given the Name above all names in service of human welfare -of all.

Pentecost is not a restoration of a single tongue which would be what we'd expect if Pentecost was some kind of reversal of Babel. No, the pluriformity of tongues is affirmed and becomes the vehicle of the proclamation -to the ends of the earth (echoing Genesis). Pentecost is the redemption of Babel and the (re-)affirmation of the 'judgement' on it. Pentecost is an implicit critique of the project of Empire (Babylon -that is Babel) and its imposition of uniformity in pursuit of self-aggrandisement. Pentecost re-affirms that God is interested in all not just a few. "Now the whole earth had one language and few words. And as men migrated from the east, they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there. And they said to one another, 'Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly.' And they had brick for stone, and bitumen for mortar. Then they said, 'Come, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.' And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the sons of men had built. And the LORD said, 'Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language; and this is only the beginning of what they will do; and nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. Come, let us go down, and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.' So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city.' Therefore its name was called Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of all the earth; and from there the LORD scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth." (Genesis 11:1-9)

Further reading: The Liberating Image by Richard Middleton

Ash Nazg ....

It's a solar eclipse picture but somehow it puts me in mind of the Lord of the Ring.

Annular solar eclipse

from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg

spotlight heart cross

Another photo from Marygate House on Lindisfarne.

The Science And Spirituality Of Addiction

 What drew me in was the collocation of science and spirituality in the title. I'm also a little interested in addiction through having ...