It's tough for the Kyoto protocol -but it may be that Russsia won't ratify and a change -if it happens- in the complexion of the USAmerican administration may not get the USA to ratify either. So is there anything that can be done? I remember seeing this in a magazine a while back so it was good to find this Guardian article from December last.
The alternative -and perhaps even eatter alternative to Kyoto is "Contraction and convergence" and relies on the idea of setting a budget for how much carbon ther can be in the atmosphere which would be divided up on a per capita basis amongst the world's population -so we would all carry our share. How that would work beyond that -well emissions permits which could be traded. So Bangladesh could sell their unused surplus of possible emission to the USA ... read it in the article
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment