Joyti De-Laurey is to be sentence for stealing millions from moneyed men. This article points out a few home truths that I felt were well made. One is that the men concerned didn't notice for ages -theyare so rich that, well, frankly, the odd million here and there never gets noticed, there's plenty more where that came from and it just sits there doing nothing most of the time. The article suggests this is also an argument for a %50 income tax band for the super rich: if they don't notice it missing in a case like this why are they going to miss it when the government has it to do something more productive with, like funding universities [assuming we can cure them of spending it on ill-advised sorties into middle eastern countries].
Not that I'm condoning stealing, but it makes you think ...
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Bible in a Disenchanted Age -a brief review
Why this book? For me? -I've been finding myself wanting to wrestle more and more with the interface between scholarly questions and de...
-
Interesting insight into the Muslim world: my favourite progresive muslim site has been hacked and attacked by islamists accusing those who ...
-
Some readers will recall that I'm keen in principle on a thorough review of the way we do dioceses in the CofE. I'm not starry-eyed...
-
This book is one that I now seriously consider recommending to the student Christian groups I'm in touch with whose basis is Evangelic...
No comments:
Post a Comment