This is a very interesting discussion of Gnostic gospels and I was interested to learn that it may well be that the Gospel of Thomas may not deserve to be lumped in with the gnostic writings, it could be earlier and it does not betray normal Gnostic emphases, though in fact it seem that it may not add anything much to the canonical gospels.
Useful still when following up the Da Vinci Code and certain 'NewAge' claims.
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment