Mmy first reaction was rather along the lines quoted here:
"Some civil liberties groups have expressed concern over Microsoft's move. 'Body parts, in this case skin, should not be in any way patentable,' said Jim Thomas of the ETC group, which monitors developments in technology. "There are big questions here about whether individuals will be able to refuse this technology if it is used in, for example, tracking devices."
Am I being paranoid, or is there something unpleasant/creepy about having our bodies patented 'over our heads'? Or have I misunderstood what's been done here?
On a slightly different tack, the last five paras or so are intriguing, especailly the stuff about a rubber hand that was incorporated into test volunteers' sensoria ...
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment