The Observer | UK News | :
I highlight this one because I think that it is the kind of thing that is likely to get a knee-jerk reaction orm the right-wing Christian community. The story, it seems to me, is far more innocent than the headline would imply:
"by implanting the nucleus of an embryo of a mother with defective mitochondria into the egg of a woman with healthy mitochondria, the resultant foetus will be free of the destructive genetic diseases [that can be carried by mitochondrial DNA]." Iow: this is a replacement of cell nucleus into a healthy cell. THe three parent thing is that mitochdrial dna is entirely inherited from the mother and so you would produce a child genetically of its father and mother but mitochondrially of a third party. I can't really see that this is more moral complex than a blood transfusion, but we shall see.
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment