Basically they are asserting that the disparity of funding capability between themselves as private and poor citizens and a coprporation like McDonald's means that British libel laws are in effect a violation of their rights ... many of us know that laws on defamation in Britain are a bit creaky, perhaps this will begin to srot things out. Certainly the disparity between the parties in the 'McLibel' case was marked and a disincentive to the financially weaker parties pursuing their case for justice. The story of the case is referenced, should you need a refresher.
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
31 October 2004
McLibel: now inStrasbourg
Basically they are asserting that the disparity of funding capability between themselves as private and poor citizens and a coprporation like McDonald's means that British libel laws are in effect a violation of their rights ... many of us know that laws on defamation in Britain are a bit creaky, perhaps this will begin to srot things out. Certainly the disparity between the parties in the 'McLibel' case was marked and a disincentive to the financially weaker parties pursuing their case for justice. The story of the case is referenced, should you need a refresher.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Formation for participraying
As I've been thinking about the difference between group processes for intercessory (rather than 'merely' petitionary) prayer me...
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
No comments:
Post a Comment