Metanexus Institute
Intersting article from a philospher with scientific interests on the resurrection of the body. Not sure that I go entirely with it all but I do think that the non-dualist approach is basically right. Just wondered how God was supposed to fit in. I have my ideas -God is the holder of our pattern and guarantor of identity, thereby -which seems perhaps to be plug one of the holes in the argument. But then is that a God of the gaps or a legitimate 'place' for God?
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
15 October 2004
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment