I know that the Da Vinci code is a work of fiction but it still irritates me that factually it is inaccurate where is 'purports' to be based irl. I guess some of that is that for me the sudden requirement to suspend even more disbelief is an aesthetic degradation. But then also, when it comes to stuff that people [a] don't know much about and [b] can'te easily check out for themselves (even if they have the energy) then the stakes get higher.
...Like this article seems to indicate: obsessive fans not knowing the boundaries between truth and fiction are causing damage. Now tell me that it doesn't matter: it's only fiction. AS the Mayor of the town affected says: "Some don't seem to realise that it's just a story".
Telegraph | News | Da Vinci code priest is dug up, hidden from 'rapacious' relic hunters
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment