This is a must bookmark page for use in those debates where the alleged lack of scientific proof of concept is trotted out. Short of it is that there is no peer-reviewed publication in the science world that denies GW is taking place.
In the words of the abstract: "In this Essay, [Naomi] Oreskes analyzes the existing scientific literature to show that there is a robust consensus that anthropogenic global climate change is occurring. Thus, despite claims sometimes made by some groups that there is not good evidence that Earth's climate is being affected by human activities, the scientific community is in overwhelming agreement that such evidence is clear and persuasive."
Science -- Oreskes 306 (5702): 1686
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Formation for participraying
As I've been thinking about the difference between group processes for intercessory (rather than 'merely' petitionary) prayer me...
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
No comments:
Post a Comment