This is just what I keep saying about all the moral panics we seem to have about the state of English as it is currently developing. This article puts it amusingly:
"We have linguists in universities up and down the country, scientifically studying how language is used, showing that much of the conventional wisdom on language - and many of Humphrys' assertions and opinions - is factually wrong. Yet somehow these books still get published by people such as Humphrys, simply because he can use language well. I can breathe extremely well - I have done it for many years, to a consistently high standard - yet no one seems the slightest bit interested in my ideas about respiratory biology."
Just so.
Guardian Unlimited Books | News | Trussy:
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review: It happened in Hell
It seemed to me that this book set out to do two main things. One was to demonstrate that so many of our notions of what goes under the lab...
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
-
The other day on Mastodon, I came across an article about left-wing politics and Jesus. It appears to have been written from a Christian-na...
-
Unexpected (and sorry, it's from Friday -but I was a bit busy the end of last week), but I'm really pleased for the city which I sti...
No comments:
Post a Comment