You may or may not have noticed that a couple of weeks back I dropped 'The Commons Blog' from my blog roll. While I agreed with their basic stance that if externalities were included then the market would produce solutions to the environmental issues we have, I started to find that the global warming denialism and rose-tinted view of current environmental realities got too much to stomach: esentially I had an allergic reaction to right-wing market libertarianism, I guess. Interesting then to find this article critiquing the 'commoners' approach in terms of the romantic image they purvey of the owner forgetting the corporation: "despite their [ie the corporations'] legal status as individuals, they have no self. Of course corporations plan for the future, but in contrast to individuals, they are biased heavily toward short-term profit. The individuals that compose them at any given moment are under huge pressure to raise profits -- for good reason, as corporations who are not growing are eaten by others that are. A corporation does not know if it will exist in 10 years, or 5. For a corporation, the future itself is part of the commons, and yes, the result is often tragedy."
Markets, etc. | Gristmill: The environmental news blog | Grist Magazine:
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
20 February 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment