@Sfunny; having just blogged about interview technique, one of my RSS feeds delivered me this on how to interview. It's interesting because I sometimes do interview others and it is insightful on how to make sure that the process really works for the hirer. However, it's also an insight into what one can do to be interviewed better. I'm getting something about being prepared to be gently assertive in order to make sure that the things that the interviewers need to see/notice really are noticed. If the question doesn't work, say so and say why and be prepared to ask what its rationale is. I'm pretty sure that if it's done nicely and in a spirit of cooperation it can't go too far wrong except if they want dependent 'yes-sayers' Or am I wrong on this?
How to interview and hire people - scottberkun.com
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment