I wish them all the best; I can't really see how privatisation makes sense of natural public monopoly especially when the government is subsidising it anyway -how can that be anything other than paying shareholders and directors instead of distributing benefits to the public? The argument against renationalising when Railtrack went under was that it'd be too expensive, but the marchers are saying: "'You can't have individual different companies out there. The fact is it would be cheaper for the British government to renationalise it rather than bung three times the amount of subsidy that the former British Rail received.'"
Quite so.
Guardian Unlimited Politics | Special Reports | Workers to march for rail renationalisation:
08 March 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg -
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment