Several US states are trying to get the clean air act [already on the statute books] defined to include CO2. "The states say that carbon dioxide - which is produced by burning fossil fuels - can harm people just as much as the substances traditionally thought of as pollutants, because it is a greenhouse gas that traps heat on earth and thus causes climate change." We'll have to see how they do, but #I ould expect strong resistance and you can see that there are potential lines of defense to be explored. However, it could be a way to get a tacit Kyoto agreement from the USA and the arguments will be very revealing. Watch this one; I will be.
FT.com / World / US - US states sue over greenhouse gases:
Also Check out a fuller BBC report
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment