Another good article setting out the arguments, I think fairly. The last word is "Nuclear power has had 30 years of subsidies, billions of dollars poured into it and it still only produces 7% of the world's energy. We've got to find another way of doing it.' "
In fact it has been money wasted in comparison with what similar investment in renewables could have achieved. And the distressing thing is, I was writing that in the early 1980's. Nuclear power appeals to machismo, but it is by no means the pbest way to go.
BBC NEWS | UK | Is Britain's future really nuclear?:
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A review of Faithful Exchange
My interest in Christian considerations of economics goes back decades. I studied economics at A level before I started university and have...
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
-
Unexpected (and sorry, it's from Friday -but I was a bit busy the end of last week), but I'm really pleased for the city which I sti...
-
The other day on Mastodon, I came across an article about left-wing politics and Jesus. It appears to have been written from a Christian-na...
No comments:
Post a Comment