Another good article setting out the arguments, I think fairly. The last word is "Nuclear power has had 30 years of subsidies, billions of dollars poured into it and it still only produces 7% of the world's energy. We've got to find another way of doing it.' "
In fact it has been money wasted in comparison with what similar investment in renewables could have achieved. And the distressing thing is, I was writing that in the early 1980's. Nuclear power appeals to machismo, but it is by no means the pbest way to go.
BBC NEWS | UK | Is Britain's future really nuclear?:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg -
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment