Another good article setting out the arguments, I think fairly. The last word is "Nuclear power has had 30 years of subsidies, billions of dollars poured into it and it still only produces 7% of the world's energy. We've got to find another way of doing it.' "
In fact it has been money wasted in comparison with what similar investment in renewables could have achieved. And the distressing thing is, I was writing that in the early 1980's. Nuclear power appeals to machismo, but it is by no means the pbest way to go.
BBC NEWS | UK | Is Britain's future really nuclear?:
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review: It happened in Hell
It seemed to me that this book set out to do two main things. One was to demonstrate that so many of our notions of what goes under the lab...
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
-
Unexpected (and sorry, it's from Friday -but I was a bit busy the end of last week), but I'm really pleased for the city which I sti...
-
The other day on Mastodon, I came across an article about left-wing politics and Jesus. It appears to have been written from a Christian-na...
No comments:
Post a Comment