13 June 2005

My right to offend a fool

My growing misgivngs about the proposed bill on religious hatred is fuelled further by this article by Polly Toynbee. Polly is a vehement atheist and has no time for my 'superstitions' no matter how well thought-out they may be. However, I do often enjoy and find her writing helpful. So I do take notice when she writes:
"This bill is not 'closing a loophole' as Labour claims, but marches right into dangerous new terrain. Here is an example: it is now illegal to describe an ethnic group as feeble-minded. But under this law I couldn't call Christian believers similarly intellectually challenged without risk of prosecution. This crystallises the difference between racial and religious abuse. Race is something people cannot choose and it defines nothing about them as people. But beliefs are what people choose to identify with: in the rough and tumble of argument to call people stupid for their beliefs is legitimate (if perhaps unwise), but to brand them stupid on account of their race is a mortal insult. The two cannot be blurred into one - which is why the word Islamophobia is a nonsense. And now the Vatican wants the UN to include Christianophobia in its monitoring of discriminations."
The whole article is worth a look -even if it also serves to demonstrate how 'religious' secularists can be!
Guardian Unlimited | Guardian daily comment | My right to offend a fool:

No comments:

"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"

 I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...