I thought this from an article on the Guardian's immanent change to a new format was really interesting."The website has been a great success, but 80 per cent of the awards it has received have been inspired by the print version. It enhances our reputation around the world. We are liberal, English language, not American and trustworthy; there is not much of that around. But it is still premature to say definitively how it will work out. The Google road is search-based advertising, and if that's the case, we'd rather have 11 million readers a month than 100,000 subscribers"
Lots of food for cultural comment there?
MediaGuardian.co.uk | Media | The changing of the Guardian:
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A review of Common Threads
Most of my Christian life, I've been what is usually labelled "an inclusivist". Lately I've been re-examining what that ...
-
Interesting insight into the Muslim world: my favourite progresive muslim site has been hacked and attacked by islamists accusing those who ...
-
This is the normal package I've noticed being advertised: "It is expected that for a House-for-Duty appointment the priest will car...
-
This book is one that I now seriously consider recommending to the student Christian groups I'm in touch with whose basis is Evangelic...
No comments:
Post a Comment