14 October 2005

Reunderstanding prayer

"prayer as a natural conversation with God - not a "follow this pattern" is an interesting statement. I kind of warm to it but I think it is also a sentiment that can be misleading and inhibit our spiritual growth in certain circumstances. I deal with the issue in "Praying the pattern" but let me just overview some of the issues.

First, don't hear me to say that I don't think that we shouldn't try to relate to God 'naturally', I just am not sure what that really means beyond the sloganeering.
  • Jesus expected us to use a pattern to relate to God at least some of the time: that's what the Lord's prayer is.
  • What is 'natural' about conversing with a being whose normal vocabulary and speech usually includes things that are beyond the human vocal tract and can and does transcend speech?
  • Do we acknowledge that mostly what we mean by 'conversing naturally' is actually only a part of our conversational repertoire and may not always be relevant to God-communing?
  • Do we realise how ideological/mythical is this meme about prayer?

To help understanding my position, perhaps I should say that I very much agree with the whole thing about prayer without the drama -I think: I'm working on a book/ big article about group prayer on the assumption that God is already in on the conversation before we 'deign' to turn to prayer. In doing so I analyze the dynamics of normal conversation and show how prayer isn't normal conversation and how we might make it more that way.
john o'keefe

No comments:

Review: It happened in Hell

 It seemed to me that this book set out to do two main things. One was to demonstrate that so many of our notions of what goes under the lab...