what if those who debate that humans have no effect on the climate are correct? Ask yourself which has more potential harmful long-term effect: 1) choosing habits that prioritize a concept of "first, do no harm" to the planet, or 2) waiting for a partisan debate to be resolved before taking simple actions (when neither side's theories can be proven)? Why wait?
Ask yourself how the US administration can attempt to convince other countries to join it in spending billions to go to war over the theoretical desires of one man to use theoretical WMD against the US or its interests, yet this same administration chooses to do nothing about climate change because it's theoretical? Saddam's threats, compared to the consequences of global climate change, were child's play.
Carbon Neutral Actions on Squidoo
Filed in: climate, CO2, emissions, biosphere
No comments:
Post a Comment