The title gives hope of action that means many people won't have to change their eating habits. However, I think that a little more thought gives us, in fact, another reason for not eating (much) meat if one is at all concerned about reducing your global-warming quotient. "Farmed ruminant animals are thought to be responsible for up to a quarter of 'man-made' methane emissions worldwide though, contrary to common belief, most gas emerges from their front, not rear, ends."
It goes like this; less meat eaten (and dairy products too) translates to less ruminant-born methane production and so less of a huge contributor to global warming (like it's massively more insulating than carbon dioxide).
So don't wait for the technical fix: it'll be years in coming; reduce or eliminate your meat and dairy intake straight away and you'll help save tons of the stuff.
Move to cut methane emissions by changing cows' diet | Climate change | Guardian Unlimited Environment:
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review: It happened in Hell
It seemed to me that this book set out to do two main things. One was to demonstrate that so many of our notions of what goes under the lab...
-
I'm not sure people have believed me when I've said that there have been discovered uncaffeinated coffee beans. Well, here's one...
-
Unexpected (and sorry, it's from Friday -but I was a bit busy the end of last week), but I'm really pleased for the city which I sti...
-
The other day on Mastodon, I came across an article about left-wing politics and Jesus. It appears to have been written from a Christian-na...
No comments:
Post a Comment