The title gives hope of action that means many people won't have to change their eating habits. However, I think that a little more thought gives us, in fact, another reason for not eating (much) meat if one is at all concerned about reducing your global-warming quotient. "Farmed ruminant animals are thought to be responsible for up to a quarter of 'man-made' methane emissions worldwide though, contrary to common belief, most gas emerges from their front, not rear, ends."
It goes like this; less meat eaten (and dairy products too) translates to less ruminant-born methane production and so less of a huge contributor to global warming (like it's massively more insulating than carbon dioxide).
So don't wait for the technical fix: it'll be years in coming; reduce or eliminate your meat and dairy intake straight away and you'll help save tons of the stuff.
Move to cut methane emissions by changing cows' diet | Climate change | Guardian Unlimited Environment:
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment