16 September 2008
Homophile and homoagapaic?
Ever since a college forum on human sexuality in the summer term, I've been musing over the fact that I find the arguments against homosexual relationships (I'm talking about non-promiscuous, here) based in Romans 1 less and less convincing. And today I read something that seemed to make sense of the implausibility, for me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg -
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment