So what's the alternative? Well, there have been some more serious attempts to dethrone this metaphor:
By this suggestion, when we hear or read language, the computational principles of this innate grammar conduct a series of logical operations, which parse the incoming stream according to its component parts, and so yield understanding.
But what if this is simply the wrong metaphor?
What if – say – language is more like a search engine? ....
A search engine is a probabilistic, predictive learning machine. Unlike spreadsheets, search engines do not engage with their input in a determinate, preprogrammed manner. Instead of rigidly structuring incoming information according to some prefabricated set of rules, they discover structure within information. ...
This metaphor gives rise to a fundamentally different view of language: one in which language acquisition relies on relatively simple – yet powerful – learning mechanisms, and in which language comprehension and production is fundamentally predictive, rather than determinate.
No comments:
Post a Comment