This seems the kind of stats that ought to ggo into sex education and relationship education. My question is whether it actually will find its way to the curriculum ...
Couples who delay having sex get benefits later, study finds:
"A statistical analysis showed the following benefits enjoyed by couples who waited until marriage compared to those who started having sex in the early part of their relationship:
* Relationship stability was rated 22 percent higher
* Relationship satisfaction was rated 20 percent higher
* Sexual quality of the relationship was rated 15 percent better
* Communication was rated 12 percent better
For couples in between -- those that became sexually involved later in the relationship but prior to marriage -- the benefits were about half as strong."
The researchers, if the report is accurate enough, seem to have spotted some of the most likely issues in their methodology. The issue may be whether the actual questioning was fair-enough ...
However, like many pieces of research, the longevity and plausibility come down to whether there is a good hypothesis as to why. The article seems to put a finger on a likely runner for that: energy/time given to developing the relationship well-roundedly.
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment