I just got a phone call.
A recorded voice began: "This is an important message ..."
I put the phone down muttering, "If it's so important, why is it a recorded message?"
In an age of cheap reproduction of all kinds of messages, importance is marked by personal attention, time given and demonstrable consideration of ones personal circumstances and background. An effectively broadcast message just doesn't do that.
Of course, the age of googlised personalisation where targetted but automated messages are more and more accurately deployed to personal history may change that somewhat. But probably in a way that makes a real person more valuable in conveying the message "this is/you are important". Consider the value of a handwritten letter against a printed one against a leaflet.
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Science And Spirituality Of Addiction
What drew me in was the collocation of science and spirituality in the title. I'm also a little interested in addiction through having ...
-
Interesting insight into the Muslim world: my favourite progresive muslim site has been hacked and attacked by islamists accusing those who ...
-
Some readers will recall that I'm keen in principle on a thorough review of the way we do dioceses in the CofE. I'm not starry-eyed...
-
This book is one that I now seriously consider recommending to the student Christian groups I'm in touch with whose basis is Evangelic...
No comments:
Post a Comment